![]() ![]() A vast array of more granular services and functions can be added throughout this stack, such as machine learning, security and monitoring and ![]() a cloud infrastructure stack, which includes abstracted infrastructure (physical and virtualized hardware resources), platform infrastructure (application servers and databases), applications and services.a storage stack, which includes servers and server software, virtualization and networking components.a server stack, which includes the hardware, operating system and supporting software such as runtime environments, database software and software for various web services.Some are constructed to deliver a technology product or service, while others support a business purpose. There are many types of technology stacks. In modern enterprise IT, software increasingly makes up more of these stacks. A technology stack includes both software and hardware components of IT infrastructure.Ī full technology stack includes all aspects of IT infrastructure required to deploy and manage applications and services: hardware and software components, databases, middleware, storage and networking. A software stack incorporates only software components required to run an application, some of which could be virtualization or abstracted physical hardware resources. The simplest distinction between a software stack and a technology stack is implied in their names. Other components that can be part of a more complicated software stack include abstracted physical resources and virtualization, scheduling and orchestration, databases, computing, networking, security, user interface and more. There is no baseline standard for the components and services that must be in a software stack, except that their features and functions support an application's development, delivery and operation.ĭepending on the desired application, this could be at a minimum: an operating system, database, tools to support a programming language, and the application. Pros and Cons on both sides!Įyepiece projection is nice, but I need a smaller camera sensor for that.Software stacks can be simple or complicated, depending on the desired application functionality, and can incorporate components and services from an organization's on-premises resources, third-party providers (such as SaaS vendors) or supplied by a cloud provider. Video stacking and stitching was annoying. Processing of the photos takes forever, but is done fully automatic. The photostack has lots of detail, but still a lot noise. My conclusions: The video stack is basically noiseless but lacks in detail. Voila! This is by far the best result from all the different methods. Create Smartobject and use Median for Stacking. Choose only the best ones and load into layers in PS. Version E: My new favourite workflow!!! 1. Looks pretty good because Autostakkert has much better stacking options than fitswork. Do do this, I converted all photos to tif and I cut all photos in half, stacked them, and stitched them again in ICE. Version D: Here I stacked 15 photos (ISO400, 1/125s) with Autostakkert. When I stack in fitswork, my camera RAWs are not recognized and I get a monochrome image. Good thing here is that I don't lose the color information. Also, the eyepiece projection becomes out-of-focus on the large APS-C sensor. However, it is by far the one with the best resolution, roughly 80 MP. The image has lots of faults and I even missed a small edge. Version C: This is a panoramic of 8 single photos shot in eyepiece projection with a 10 mm eyepiece which results in a focal lenght of ~4000mm. Stacking was done by the batch processing in fitswork in median mode. Version B: This is a stack of 45 single photos with each 4000圆000 pixel. ![]() Stacking of the single videos was done in Autostakkert, merging was done in Hugin, since ICE, LR and PS didn't work. Version A: This is a panoramic of four single full-HD videos (2x digital zoom (basically lossless in my camera), 50 frames/s, 30 s, 5% used frames due to horrible seeing) Today I tested two different stacking methods for the moon. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |